Should Healthcare Facilities Scan Old Records to EHR?


Physicians and doctors’ offices today are busier than ever. An article from The Washington Post cited a study from a 2012 article in the Annals of Family Medicine that noted the average primary-care physician has about 2,300 patients under his or her care. And more than actually caring for physicians is the work related to patient records.

While most healthcare practitioners today use electronic health records (EHRs) for current patients, a big question now relates to historic records that must be retained in order to meet HIPAA requirements.

That typically leaves healthcare facilities with three options: scan all records into EHR, continue to store healthcare records in physical format, or partner with a company to create a customized, hybrid solution. We examine the pros and cons of all three approaches.

Option 1: Scanning All Medical Records Into EHR


Records reside in one single place – The obvious pro of scanning all records into the EHR is that all records are stored in the same format using the same system. This cuts down on physical clutter and also simplifies the records process.

Physical space is used more efficiently – If physical records are stored onsite, it is not the most efficient use of office space. If space was freed up from removing physical records, that space can be used for revenue generating purposes such as seeing patients instead of simply storing records.

It removes the crutch of physical records – Many times keeping records onsite prevents staff from fully committing to electronic records, choosing instead to continue producing paper for current patients. By removing all physical records from the premise, it forces adoption of the EHR.


Scanning all records is extremely labor intensive – Scanning is an extremely labor-intensive process, which translates to an extremely expensive process. And quality is a must; therefore, any facility that chooses to scan all records must have proper quality controls put into place before embarking on a scan job.

Scanning all records typically is not necessary – Digital clutter, even not in physical form, is still clutter. In order to truly solve the problem, scanned files must be indexed, organized, and disposed of in due course.  

Bottom line: expensive and labor-intensive but has advantages when implemented correctly.

Option 2: Storing Physical Records Offsite


Office space can be used more efficiently – Similar to the solution to scan all the records, if physical records are removed from the office, it can free that space to be better utilized. used for it is not the most efficient use of office space. Space formerly used to store records can be converted into offices or desks for staff or rooms to see patients, creating additional revenue.

It removes the crutch of physical records – Many times keeping records onsite prevents staff from fully committing to electronic records, choosing instead to continue producing paper for current patients. By removing all physical records from the premise, it forces adoption of the EHR.


Storage typically isn’t the problem – Many times healthcare facilities think they have a storage problem (where to put physical records) when really it is a management problem. If records are just moved offsite, the problem isn’t truly solved; it is simply relocated.

Certain storage companies have no incentive to destroy documents – Depending on the offsite storage solution you choose, you may end up paying for records storage indefinitely, even after records are eligible for destruction. Without active management of retention dates, you end up paying for keeping records that are no longer needed and that could become a liability if kept past retention and become discoverable.

Bottom line – Moving records offsite only deals with the issue at a surface level without truly addressing the problem.

Option 3: Hybrid Approach


The underlying problem is addressed – With a hybrid approach, you will truly understand what records you have. At SRS, we call this indexing. Our team comes onsite and packs up the records you, sorts them at the file level based on their retention requirement so each box has the same requirement, and inventory them at the file level with 3 indices to optimize search capabilities, then applies your retention policy to automate destruction of records that are eligible, and to tell you how long the remaining records must be kept.

The hybrid approach will save you money – The savings compared to scanning everything are obvious – typically this approach is a fraction of the cost of scanning. While storage without indexing may seem cheaper on the surface, if files are not being destroyed, that cost will remain fixed indefinitely. At SRS, we typically find that 30-40% of a client’s records are immediately eligible for destruction, saving them the cost of storing or scanning records they’ll never need. Furthermore, as records become eligible for destruction, we notify them and handle the shredding. As storage volume is reduced, the cost goes down until it eventually is $0.


This approach will require you to think differently – The SRS hybrid approach to document management is unique. As such, it will require a different way of thinking to solve this problem. Many people think that “scan everything” or “move if offsite” is the easy answer, but neither truly solves the problem, which may mean continued process problems down the road, including difficulty adopting EMR.

If you are interested in learning more about our unique, hybrid approach to document management, contact SRS today.


Our Latest Consulting Insights

Happy Holidays from Secure Records Solutions

If you’re like me, this year probably had you spending nights re-watching classic movies instead of typical evening social activities. I recently saw one of my favorites: Tom Hanks’ Apollo 13, based on the space expedition of the same name. While the crew didn’t achieve […]

Read More

Christopher Jones Named One of Georgia’s Top 40 Under 40

Christopher Powell Jones of Thomasville, Georgia was named one of Georgia’s top 40 under 40by Georgia Trendmagazine. This annual list honors Georgians under age 40 for notable contributions to their professions, community and state. “I am honored and humbled to be selected for Georgia Trend’s2020 […]

Read More

Is Scanning the Best Solution for Your Unique Business Needs?

Why Scanning May Not Be the Solution & Different Applications for Scanning Across Industries and Business Functions The process of scanning records is a common theme across industries and even business functions within one organization. As scan experts, however, we at Secure Records Solutions have […]

Read More

What’s the best shredding solution for government agencies?

As election season draws closer, governments and municipalities likely will become extremely busy – and their paper production will increase as a result. This is on top of the regular obligations related to documents, including responding to its constituents’ public information requests, preserving public records, […]

Read More

Searching for the Best Scanning Company Near You?

First, know your “why” Looking for scanning company near you? Every day companies come to SRS looking for a scanning project to be completed. And the first question we ask is “why?”. You see, scanning is extremely expensive because of the labor required. There is […]

Read More


SRS has obtained the PRISM Privacy + Certification

Secure Records Solutions is proud to announce that we have recently received our Privacy + Certification. This is in addition to the NAID AAA Certification that SRS has had since 2013. SRS is the only independent records management facility to maintain both the Privacy + […]

Read More

Eight Questions to Ask Before Hiring a Shredding Service

First time hiring a shredding service? At Secure Records Solutions, we work with many clients who are outsourcing their shredding for the first time ever. After years of DIY shredding, they have outgrown their ability to efficiently and effectively shred in-house. We urge clients who […]

Read More